EBS vs. EFS: A Comprehensive Guide to AWS Storage Solutions

EBS vs. EFS: A Comprehensive Guide to AWS Storage Solutions

Β·

3 min read

In the world of AWS storage services, understanding the nuances between Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Storage) and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is crucial. Let's delve into their definitions, characteristics, use cases, and a comparative analysis to grasp their functionalities better.

EBS (Elastic Blog Store)

Amazon EBS, known as Elastic Block Store, is designed for exclusive use with EC2 instances. Acting as a block-level storage service, EBS offers high performance, making it ideal for various applications, including databases and software development.

Panorama - How it Works

EBS stores files in multiple volumes called blocks, which act as separate hard drives, and this storage is not accessible via the internet. EBS is similar to a hard-drive connected to a physical device and this storage can be attached or detached at any time.

EFS (Elastic File System)

Amazon EFS, or Elastic File System, provides shared elastic file storage with virtually unlimited scalability. Managed by AWS, EFS offers automatic scalability, ensuring users only pay for the storage they use. Its unique feature of scalability on-the-fly makes it stand out, especially for fluctuating workloads.

Amazon EFS - How it works

One of the most prominent features of EFS that separates it from all other storage is that the IOPS rate in EFS is inversely proportional to the size of data. For example, if the size of data is less, then the performance and IOPS rate might be not much significant but when used more heavily, EFS can offer as much as 10 GB/sec along with 500,000 IOPS.

Use Cases:

  • Amazon EBS: Suited for software testing and development, business continuity, enterprise-wide applications, and transactional databases.

  • Amazon EFS: Ideal for lift-and-shift application support, analytics for big data, web server support, and application development/testing.

Comparison based on Characteristics:

  1. Storage Type:

    • EBS: Block-level

    • EFS: File-level

  2. Availability:

    • EBS: Directly attached

    • EFS: Highly durable and available

  3. Durability:

    • EBS: Offers 20 times more reliability

    • EFS: Highly durable

  4. Performance:

    • EBS: Offers baseline performance

    • EFS: Supports up to 7000 file system operations per second

  5. Data Access:

    • EBS: Accessible by a single EC2 instance

    • EFS: Supports concurrent access by multiple EC2 instances

  6. Data Stored:

    • EBS: Data remains in the same availability zone

    • EFS: Data stays within the same region

  7. Managed Service:

    • EBS: Requires patching and maintenance

    • EFS: Fully managed

  8. File Size Limitation:

    • EBS: No file size limit

    • EFS: Maximum file size up to 47.9TiB

  9. Encryption:

    • Both support encryption using AWS KMS and AES 256-bit Encryption standards
  10. Cost Savings:

    • EBS: Requires fixed volume attachment

    • EFS: Charges based on usage


Fuck You Silicon Valley GIF

In conclusion, both Amazon EBS and Amazon EFS serve unique purposes in the AWS ecosystem. While EBS offers high performance and reliability for specific use cases, EFS provides scalable, shared storage ideal for fluctuating workloads. Understanding their differences enables users to choose the most suitable option based on their requirements, ultimately optimizing their AWS infrastructure.

Β